njboy
06-20 10:46 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060620/ap_on_go_co/immigration
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060620/ap_on_go_co/immigration
WASHINGTON - In a defeat for President Bush, Republican congressional leaders said Tuesday that broad immigration legislation is all but doomed for the year, a victim of election-year concerns in the House and conservatives' implacable opposition to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060620/ap_on_go_co/immigration
WASHINGTON - In a defeat for President Bush, Republican congressional leaders said Tuesday that broad immigration legislation is all but doomed for the year, a victim of election-year concerns in the House and conservatives' implacable opposition to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants.
wallpaper of Casey Anthony#39;s parents
brij523
03-02 06:00 AM
hi anyone there!!
deecha
09-15 04:52 PM
I wonder what the ACLU will come up with :)
More business for them .... lol .. :-)
More business for them .... lol .. :-)
2011 images marc anthony photoshop
Tommy_S
04-08 11:58 AM
wow! Very creative, fes. Those stamps gonna be pop. :thumb:
more...
suny_saini
08-04 06:40 AM
my name was not interview with my family.
my family gave interview and embassy asked for original I140 and I824 approval notices to check my eligibility.
i submitted and now after 2 weaks got the follwing reply:
In your case , the I-140 was filed on sept 10, 2001 and approved on october 08, 2003. The visa became available on october 08, 2003 . Form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa became available. <my name> was born on January 03, 1986. because he (me) is above 21 years old an immigrant visa as a derivative beneficiary of Employment third prefrence (e3) immigrant visa category cannot be inssued to <my name>. In order to qualify for a visa, he (me) would need to benifit from CSPA. Since form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa becoming available on October 08, 2003.
<my name> cannot be processed under CSPA.
but i think and i am not sure if i am right or wrong that I824 can be filed after issuance of green card, but at that time my dad ddnt got green card.
SO plz help me with right advice and solution so that i can travel with my family.
my mom and bro got te visa and it will expire in 6 monts and i want to go with them, can i be able to get visa in any case before their visa expire?
i badly need help.
my family gave interview and embassy asked for original I140 and I824 approval notices to check my eligibility.
i submitted and now after 2 weaks got the follwing reply:
In your case , the I-140 was filed on sept 10, 2001 and approved on october 08, 2003. The visa became available on october 08, 2003 . Form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa became available. <my name> was born on January 03, 1986. because he (me) is above 21 years old an immigrant visa as a derivative beneficiary of Employment third prefrence (e3) immigrant visa category cannot be inssued to <my name>. In order to qualify for a visa, he (me) would need to benifit from CSPA. Since form I-824 was not filed within one year of visa becoming available on October 08, 2003.
<my name> cannot be processed under CSPA.
but i think and i am not sure if i am right or wrong that I824 can be filed after issuance of green card, but at that time my dad ddnt got green card.
SO plz help me with right advice and solution so that i can travel with my family.
my mom and bro got te visa and it will expire in 6 monts and i want to go with them, can i be able to get visa in any case before their visa expire?
i badly need help.
amitga
01-15 09:18 PM
Atleast they should allow that.
more...
Seb Hughes
05-07 06:06 AM
Wow that is crazy
2010 casey anthony myspace
REQUIRE_GC
07-25 04:53 PM
Dear friends,
I received card production e-mail today.
My PD June 2007, RD Oct 2007. No REFEs. EB1 India.
Thanks for all the help and good counsel.
Lesson from this experience: Learn to handle delays. Take things in your stride. Do not make GC as end of your life. We can work anywhere and be happy, though US is a preferred destination.
In this process, I made so many friends and learned to heed others views and good advice.
Will continue to work for IV.
CONGRATS!!!
I received card production e-mail today.
My PD June 2007, RD Oct 2007. No REFEs. EB1 India.
Thanks for all the help and good counsel.
Lesson from this experience: Learn to handle delays. Take things in your stride. Do not make GC as end of your life. We can work anywhere and be happy, though US is a preferred destination.
In this process, I made so many friends and learned to heed others views and good advice.
Will continue to work for IV.
CONGRATS!!!
more...
Berkeleybee
03-07 06:45 PM
There is nothing going on with isnamerica.
Though apparently, even with 28,000 members they don't have their own presentation, they plan to poach ours! Not by asking if they could btw, just poaching.
Check this out
http://www.isnamerica.org/forums/showthread.php?t=410&page=7
Though apparently, even with 28,000 members they don't have their own presentation, they plan to poach ours! Not by asking if they could btw, just poaching.
Check this out
http://www.isnamerica.org/forums/showthread.php?t=410&page=7
hair hairstyles Casey Anthony: Baez Wants casey anthony photoshop.
Karan
08-22 05:50 PM
I've recently filed my 485.
In my labor and I140 I have my job title as ' Data ware house architect'.
My H1 says 'Programmer Analyst'. So while applying my 485 I menationed my current occupation as 'Programmer Analyst', which is different from what my labor and 140 says.Will this create any problem?
Please advise.
In my labor and I140 I have my job title as ' Data ware house architect'.
My H1 says 'Programmer Analyst'. So while applying my 485 I menationed my current occupation as 'Programmer Analyst', which is different from what my labor and 140 says.Will this create any problem?
Please advise.
more...
BharatPremi
09-20 09:16 PM
"Na Koi Umang Hai, Na Koi Tarang Hai".. "Meri Zindgi hai kya Kati Patang Hai" :mad:
hot was in Casey Anthony#39;s car
ss1026
06-22 12:37 PM
My friend has a GC since Sep 2004. He recently went to India and married a person who has a stamped F-1 Visa though she has not entered the USA yet. They are planning to enter US this month. Is this legal? What should they be worried about and what are my friend's options if he wants to settle down with his wife in the USA. Will there be an complications if he applies for her GC or should he rather wait till he gets his Citizenship. Any comments would be appreciated
more...
house casey anthony photoshop.
Blog Feeds
07-27 03:40 PM
U.S. Department of Labor has implemented a new integrated online system � known as the iCert Portal � through which employers can submit applications for permanent labor certification, labor condition applications (LCAs) and other applications for immigration-related DOL programs. In addition, the agency will introduce new editions of Form ETA-9089, the PERM labor certification application, and have already introduced Form ETA-9035, the labor condition application. iCert has already replaced the method of LCA filing for H-1B. The new iCert system begins to accept LCAs as of July 1, 2009. Employer and attorneys as the case may be, can still use the old LCA account but cannot submit new LCA. New LCA has to be filed from iCert.
Following are the new changes which has taken place:
- The new LCA requires writing the SOC (ONET/OES) code and the occupation title for the job.
- The new LCA has a section for basis for the visa classification supported by the application. There are the following categories:
a. New employment;
b. Continuation of previously approved employment without change with the same employer;
c. Change in previously approved employment;
d. New concurrent employment;
e. Change of employer;
f. Amended petition.
- One has to indicate the total number of H-1B/H-1B1 (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) non-immigrant workers.
- The new LCA also requires, in the employer information section, to indicate the Trade name/doing business as (DBA), if applicable, the old LCA does not have this requirement.
- In the new LCA, one is required to write NAICS code.
- There is a new section in the new LCA - Employer point of contact information, which requires to indicate the following: full contact�s name; contact�s job; contact�s address; contact�s telephone number; contact�s e-mail address.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/07/icert_portal_for_lca_filing.html)
Following are the new changes which has taken place:
- The new LCA requires writing the SOC (ONET/OES) code and the occupation title for the job.
- The new LCA has a section for basis for the visa classification supported by the application. There are the following categories:
a. New employment;
b. Continuation of previously approved employment without change with the same employer;
c. Change in previously approved employment;
d. New concurrent employment;
e. Change of employer;
f. Amended petition.
- One has to indicate the total number of H-1B/H-1B1 (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) non-immigrant workers.
- The new LCA also requires, in the employer information section, to indicate the Trade name/doing business as (DBA), if applicable, the old LCA does not have this requirement.
- In the new LCA, one is required to write NAICS code.
- There is a new section in the new LCA - Employer point of contact information, which requires to indicate the following: full contact�s name; contact�s job; contact�s address; contact�s telephone number; contact�s e-mail address.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/07/icert_portal_for_lca_filing.html)
tattoo casey anthony photoshop.
nhfirefighter13
June 12th, 2004, 02:19 PM
The one with the girl and the waterfall is a masterpiece! It makes me curious about the situation. Where was it taken?
Thanks!
That was taken last October on the Island of Dominica at a place called Emerald Pool (believed to be the "fountain of youth" by the locals). The girl in the pic is my girlfriend's sister and didn't mind playing model for me. :)
I'll try to find a color shot of the pool and waterfall for you. Very nice place, buried in the rain forest.
Thanks!
That was taken last October on the Island of Dominica at a place called Emerald Pool (believed to be the "fountain of youth" by the locals). The girl in the pic is my girlfriend's sister and didn't mind playing model for me. :)
I'll try to find a color shot of the pool and waterfall for you. Very nice place, buried in the rain forest.
more...
pictures casey anthony photoshop. in
svam77
07-22 04:57 PM
Do not do that !! Its a part of the initial evidence andyour application can be rejected based on that.
You can ask her parents to take an afidavit, scan it and send it to u ....
You can ask her parents to take an afidavit, scan it and send it to u ....
dresses casey anthony photoshop.
Anil_s
03-20 04:09 PM
Hi All,
Thank you for your respnse.My attorney has filed for a duplicate copy now.
Anil
Thank you for your respnse.My attorney has filed for a duplicate copy now.
Anil
more...
makeup pictures Casey Anthony Now
Blog Feeds
11-01 09:10 AM
According to a recent USCIS guidance an employer may not hire an H-1B worker prior to USCIS approving the H-1B petition unless the employee (i) is currently in H-1B status, or (ii) is the beneficiary of a timely filed H-1B (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html) extension of status petition. If the employee is in another nonimmigrant status, such as F-1 (student) or L-1 (intracompany transfer), the employer must wait until USCIS approves the H-1B petition before hiring the foreign worker.
Under section 214(n) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a worker who "was previously issued a visa or otherwise provided [H-1B] nonimmigrant status" is authorized to begin working upon the filing of an H-1B petition by his or her new employer. This provision is often referred to as H-1B portability. Congress passed the law to allow employers to hire H-1B workers without having to wait for the government to adjudicate the H-1B petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html), a process that can often take several months.
The issue was raised to the USCIS Verification Division after employers received nonconfirmations from the E-Verify system when they hired H-1B workers under H-1B portability and the workers were not, at the time of hire, in H-1B status, or were not the beneficiaries of H-1B extension petitions. In the exchange, the USCIS Verification Division stated that the agency does not consider those employees to be work authorized. Please contact our office for further information.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/10/h1b_visa_attorney_guidance_reg.html)
Under section 214(n) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, a worker who "was previously issued a visa or otherwise provided [H-1B] nonimmigrant status" is authorized to begin working upon the filing of an H-1B petition by his or her new employer. This provision is often referred to as H-1B portability. Congress passed the law to allow employers to hire H-1B workers without having to wait for the government to adjudicate the H-1B petitions (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html), a process that can often take several months.
The issue was raised to the USCIS Verification Division after employers received nonconfirmations from the E-Verify system when they hired H-1B workers under H-1B portability and the workers were not, at the time of hire, in H-1B status, or were not the beneficiaries of H-1B extension petitions. In the exchange, the USCIS Verification Division stated that the agency does not consider those employees to be work authorized. Please contact our office for further information.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/10/h1b_visa_attorney_guidance_reg.html)
girlfriend /news2011/casey-anthony-
Pravan
06-13 03:41 PM
I'm a July 2007 filer going to file for my EAD for the first time. Since I'm currently on H1B, how should I answer this question
I'm applying for:
a) Permission to accept employment
b) Replacement
c) Renewal of my permission to accept employment
I think I need to go with option "c" since moving from H1B to EAD would qualify for a "c" response
Please advise.....
Thanks
I'm applying for:
a) Permission to accept employment
b) Replacement
c) Renewal of my permission to accept employment
I think I need to go with option "c" since moving from H1B to EAD would qualify for a "c" response
Please advise.....
Thanks
hairstyles hot casey anthony photoshop.
Blog Feeds
11-08 03:30 PM
USCIS recently issued a Memo that amends Adjudicator�s Field Manual on General Form I-140 Issues. Many issues are covered, but one of particular interest to our PERM (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1135851.html)readers is the Labor Certification Validity for Labor Certifications with an Ending Validity Date that Falls on a Saturday, Sunday or Federal Legal Holiday.
DOL has established a 180-day validity period for approved labor certifications. See 20 CFR 656.30(b). An approved labor certification must be filed in support of a Form 1-140 petition during the labor certification's validity period. DOL has not published any guidance regarding the treatment of labor certifications that effectively have a validity period of less than 180 days due to an ending validity date that falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a federal legal holiday.
USCIS will accept the filing of 1-140 petitions where the supporting labor certification validity period ends on a Saturday, Sunday or federal legal holiday on the next business day, i.e., the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or federal legal holiday. This action is most consistent with existing USCIS regulations, which allow cut-off dates for the filing of petitions and applications that fall on a Saturday, Sunday or federal legal holiday to be extended until the next business day. See 8 CFR 1.1 (h). This procedure provides petitioning employers the benefit of the full 180 day validity period for approved labor certifications established by DOL.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/perm_approved_labor_certificat.html)
DOL has established a 180-day validity period for approved labor certifications. See 20 CFR 656.30(b). An approved labor certification must be filed in support of a Form 1-140 petition during the labor certification's validity period. DOL has not published any guidance regarding the treatment of labor certifications that effectively have a validity period of less than 180 days due to an ending validity date that falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or a federal legal holiday.
USCIS will accept the filing of 1-140 petitions where the supporting labor certification validity period ends on a Saturday, Sunday or federal legal holiday on the next business day, i.e., the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or federal legal holiday. This action is most consistent with existing USCIS regulations, which allow cut-off dates for the filing of petitions and applications that fall on a Saturday, Sunday or federal legal holiday to be extended until the next business day. See 8 CFR 1.1 (h). This procedure provides petitioning employers the benefit of the full 180 day validity period for approved labor certifications established by DOL.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/11/perm_approved_labor_certificat.html)
georgecombey
04-27 11:36 AM
Because of fraud, terrorists are able to infiltrate the US.
SK2007
10-10 04:37 PM
Guys,
I spoke to another Border Post official and he suggested that i drive uptp the nearest border and they would refuse my entry to Canada as i don't have a valid visa and i can turn around and come back to US and i can get a new I-94. Do you think it would be safe to do this ?
Any advices?
If you have travelled to Canada in May even if you have a single entry visa into Canda, you are more likely to be let into canda than refused. On the way back if you ask they might issue you a new I-94, strictly speaking they don't have to unless you have stayed some period (I don't know the exact period) out side the country.
Most parents coming to US on visitor visa and wanting to stay in us for more than 6 months apply for new I-94s(extension), just because attempting to cross the border does not give them a new I-94.
I spoke to another Border Post official and he suggested that i drive uptp the nearest border and they would refuse my entry to Canada as i don't have a valid visa and i can turn around and come back to US and i can get a new I-94. Do you think it would be safe to do this ?
Any advices?
If you have travelled to Canada in May even if you have a single entry visa into Canda, you are more likely to be let into canda than refused. On the way back if you ask they might issue you a new I-94, strictly speaking they don't have to unless you have stayed some period (I don't know the exact period) out side the country.
Most parents coming to US on visitor visa and wanting to stay in us for more than 6 months apply for new I-94s(extension), just because attempting to cross the border does not give them a new I-94.
0 comments:
Post a Comment